Wednesday, May 11, 2011

fast five charger

fast five charger. fast-five-charger.jpg
  • fast-five-charger.jpg



  • Kwill
    Apr 18, 03:56 PM
    Don't bite the hand that screws you. :eek:





    fast five charger. Fast Five: “Hot in Rio”
  • Fast Five: “Hot in Rio”



  • ChrisTX
    Apr 20, 05:25 AM
    Wirelessly posted (iPhone : Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_6 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E200 Safari/6533.18.5)

    I am happy for this, this means when my upgrade happens, iPhone 6 will be a HUGE one :-)

    The only problem is now your upgrade will be more than the 2 year mark if they decide to bump the iPhone refresh cycle to the fall.





    fast five charger. Fast Five® Dodge Charger Matte
  • Fast Five® Dodge Charger Matte



  • iliketyla
    Mar 29, 03:50 PM
    Could we please get the OOT people here discussing where apple should manufacture their products (or where they can manufacture their products) in separate thread. You guys are imposing here you know? This is a discussion about shortages due to the earthquake not manufacturing locales for apple. An earthquake could have hit the states as well...

    As threads progress, sometimes the conversation evolves. You added nothing of value in your post.





    fast five charger. fast five 2011 dodge charger.
  • fast five 2011 dodge charger.



  • drummondi
    Sep 15, 11:10 PM
    I've just been wanting one for so long, and all I've been waiting for is a processor trade-out, that I'll be happy with just that. Of course I'll be quite please if they implement the easy access HD bay. Better still, a better gfx card would make me pee my pants a little.

    I think you should go get your prostate checked.





    fast five charger. fast five 2011 dodge charger.
  • fast five 2011 dodge charger.



  • Northgrove
    May 6, 04:26 AM
    So many saying this makes no sense, without specifying why.

    It makes less sense to develop two converging operating systems for two incompatible (on a low level) architectures.





    fast five charger. Video: Fast Five main chase
  • Video: Fast Five main chase



  • MovieCutter
    Jul 29, 09:29 PM
    Haven't we heard before from this "tech-unsavvy friend, who is regularly hired by Apple to do marketing photo shoots", maybe sometime in the past year or two? The line sounds familiar. I don't recall if the previous bit of information from that source was true or not.


    Yeah, he took pictures of the new iMac G5 in an elevator...;)





    fast five charger. Fast Five: Dodge Charger
  • Fast Five: Dodge Charger



  • McBeats
    Apr 5, 04:46 PM
    compared to sony, apple is damn near supporting the jailbreak community

    totally agreed...

    ------

    Anyway it's ********** ugly!

    EXACTLY. Sorry Toyota, but it's pretty rough.





    fast five charger. Fast and Furious: Fast 5 – New
  • Fast and Furious: Fast 5 – New



  • Coolerking
    Sep 11, 09:05 AM
    I think its fair to assume at this stage no macbook/pro updates will be shown tomorrow. All they do is distract from the media/ipod announcements. best you can hope for is a quiet refresh towards the end of this week.

    M.

    Or later today. Although with 9/11 being at the forefront of the news I doubt it.

    Early tomorrow would be best.





    fast five charger. Fast Five: Dodge Charger
  • Fast Five: Dodge Charger



  • Erwin-Br
    Apr 23, 07:41 PM
    Having extra resolution would probably look awesome on the GUI, but I'm afraid everything else is going to look like crap.

    The graphics used on websites, for example, would become a pixel counting fest. Unless the entire web updates their graphics, of course. But that would mean slow loading times. Imagine all the smileys used on this forum would have a resolution of 512x512 pixels, or more. Yikes!





    fast five charger. /6 dreamdust [5] *Hard Charger
  • /6 dreamdust [5] *Hard Charger



  • AidenShaw
    Mar 29, 09:01 PM
    I simply disregard comments that have to do with religion basically.

    Silence is acquiescence, very well stated by Pastor Martin Niem�ller:

    First they came for the communists,
    and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

    Then they came for the trade unionists,
    and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews,
    and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

    Then they came for me,
    and there was no one left to speak out for me.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came

    I don't disregard comments that try to push a particular view on spirituality, gender identity/expression, or other personal and civil rights issues. Sometimes the comments are appropriate, but other times they are not. In my opinion if they're not, I'll say so.





    fast five charger. Dodge Charger in Fast Five
  • Dodge Charger in Fast Five



  • marksman
    Apr 20, 01:11 AM
    If you can have a bigger screen without a physically larger device size and weight, then yes, it is necessarily better.

    iPhone 4 with 3.5" screen: 115.2mm x 58.6mm x 9.3mm
    weight: 137 grams

    HTC Thunderbolt with 4" screen: 122mm x 66mm x 13mm
    weight: 164 grams

    I am not sure about you, but on composite that HTC with a 4" screen is noticeably larger in every possible way over the iPhone 4.

    Sure it is only 5% taller, but 12% wider and almost 50% thicker as well as 15% heavier.

    Perhaps you don't know anything about Apple, but they take the size of their devices very seriously.

    I also don't understand how some of you think it is possible to have a significantly larger screen without making the phone bigger. It is not like the current iPhone has a lot of space. Again it seems people just read a bigger number and think it must be better. If we left it up to other companies smartphones would all be twice as thick and weigh twice as much as they do now, while being massively unwieldy. Apple actually has an aesthetic set of benchmarks that are important to them as anything else. It is not only aesthetic either, but actually using the device and carrying it around, the size makes a big difference.

    My 3.5" iPhone 4 screen is pretty amazing, especially considering the size and weight of the device. Much more impressive than any 4" screened device I have seen.

    Edit: In case anyone is wondering the 4" Samsung Galaxy S specs: 122.4mm x 64.2mm x 9.9mm weight 118 grams. It weighs less, but the physical dimensions are larger in ever way.





    fast five charger. set of Fast Five in 1966
  • set of Fast Five in 1966



  • gorgeousninja
    Apr 18, 04:52 PM
    I remember first seeing the GalaxyS and it's such a blatant rip-off of Apple's design they have every right to sue on this..

    But now watch as the Apple haters try to weasel this as a 'generic' design..

    Apple brings out the 'App Store'.. everyone copies them....It's generic

    Apple brings out the iPhone... everyone copies them.. It's generic

    Imitation is a form of flattery.. but when you're business depends on having the best designs, you need to protect your edge.





    fast five charger. Dodge Charger which build for
  • Dodge Charger which build for



  • MacMan93
    Nov 26, 04:53 PM
    http://www.oqo.com/ as posted before..


    If Apple were to pull of somthing like that with the sliding keyboard with a full-featured OS X WITH the ability to function as a normal computer it would be tight as hell!





    fast five charger. action-thriller Fast Five
  • action-thriller Fast Five



  • jholzner
    Aug 11, 09:08 AM
    It sure does. Quite exciting really. I think all consumer products will get Core 2 Duo (merom + conroe) in September. Although, seeing as Merom is socket compatable with the current line up, I dont think we will see a Conroe in the iMac.

    I tend to agree that they may use Merom in the iMac but since they put Woodcrest in the Mac Pros it gives me hope that they won't use Merom in the iMac and just use it in the portable line where they really belong.





    fast five charger. Charger in quot;Fast Five.quot;
  • Charger in quot;Fast Five.quot;



  • asdf542
    Mar 28, 10:16 AM
    Sure, but the "delay" could be that iOS 5 isn't ready yet and Apple isn't going to launch iPhone 5 w/o a full iOS update. Quite possible iOS5 engineers were temp. xfered to OS X 10.7 at this final stage to ensure it makes out the door on time and w/ fewest glitches possible. Once 10.7 goes GM iOS5 development will go back to normal speed.

    Snow Leopard did not effect iOS release dates. If the iPad 2 was delayed like the rumors were suggesting then I would believe this, but it wasn't. So far all of Apple's releases for 2011 have been typical with their past schedules. No reason to think any different for this one.





    fast five charger. is featured in Fast Five,
  • is featured in Fast Five,



  • paolo-
    Apr 9, 09:49 PM
    So if the parentheses are solved first why not just put them in front? Why go through all the semantics? Do scientists purposely make it this hard when solving equations?
    No, they usually write it using specialized program so you would clearly know if it's

    48
    2 * (9+3)

    or

    ____48___
    2*(9+3)

    But really, if you see this as 48�2(9+3), I think it becomes much more clearer. Most people aren't used to see / used as a division mark other than when using two lines, not used as a simple replacement as it is for computer. But yes they wouldn't go through the trouble of rewriting an equation just to make the order of operation simpler, as that is quite easy when you work with math everyday. But they do tidy up their equations so the intent should become clear. I mean, you could type verbally an equation, this is just the equivalent to punctuation, you put a point and a capital letter to start a new sentence.

    This question is purely semantics. But scientists tend to write for other scientists who have no trouble saying this is 288. But most profs I've had hate answering questions over email simply because writing equations with regular characters is crap.





    fast five charger. Behind Fast Five - Paul Walker
  • Behind Fast Five - Paul Walker



  • xfiftyfour
    Jul 29, 10:11 PM
    http://www.devilducky.com/media/46492/

    I haven't seen this before but I guess it's old news?
    Looks pretty cool anyway..
    i hadn't seen the link before, either, but wow! i know it's a fake, but that is an AMAZING looking phone!

    "dear steve, please trash whatever progress you've made on your supposed iPhone and get working on this iTalk. thanks." :p





    fast five charger. 1970 Dodge Charger from Fast amp;
  • 1970 Dodge Charger from Fast amp;



  • Tailpike1153
    Apr 21, 02:36 PM
    I want to believe! (X-files reference). The death of the xServe made me a little sad. Glad to see that Apple is trying to work out alternatives. I realize that MacPro isn't a "proper" server but it does have more expansion capablities than the xServe. Perhaps the MacPro Serve 2011/2012 will give us faith in Apple.





    fast five charger. Dodge#39;s Fast Five Commercial
  • Dodge#39;s Fast Five Commercial



  • applesith
    Mar 29, 01:40 PM
    I'd pay a premium for products manufactured in the US.

    Products might be more expensive, but there would be more Americans employed. As much are there is a downside to producing here, there is also an upside.

    All the companies competing with Apple would have to do the same, otherwise Apple could never come even close to competitors' prices.

    There is nothing wrong with companies using resources abroad. It's called specialization. Why produce something for more money and less efficiently when it can be done better and cheaper elsewhere?





    Eidorian
    Jul 21, 02:38 PM
    To date we have not seen Apple update any of their Intel products. So it may not be any different. The pressure will be on Apple with new processors coming out all of the time. Steve Jobs keps Apple from doing what you would exspect much of the time.

    Bill the TaxManThe MacBook Pro was speed bumped, twice.





    LarryC
    May 6, 01:18 AM
    Isn't ARM a RISC processor? We just switched from RISC to CISC. And now we're going back? Let me be the first to say this... "Back to the Future." Oh dear lord. This sounds crazy, but who knows. If Apple actually owns the company that makes these processors... it could happen. Anything is possible :eek: I do hope that these ARM processors can be used with high quality GPU's. It just seems so odd after all this development and the 3D breakthrough that Intel just announced. And TB. If we're going back to RISC processors, does this mean that Firewire is gonna make a comeback?





    tstreete
    Jan 26, 07:50 PM
    Sounds like they're talking about one of their GPS devices, but its probably the same.

    I live in Vermont, which is even colder, and leave my car kit in the car overnight; FWIW it's probably gotten colder than -4F and it still works fine.





    darrens
    Aug 4, 08:28 AM
    Apple could go a long way by keeping their inventory short and getting customers the latest technology quickly.

    I think I remeber reading that exact point in an interview with an Intel exec - they like the way Apple can bring a product to market quickly, and use innovative technologies in their chips before anyone else.





    YS2003
    Nov 22, 08:59 PM
    From The Desk Of Steve Jobs:

    That's an old graffiti. With new one, you have to do two strokes for "K." I miss the first graffiti.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment